Just half a 100 after Darwin ’s controversial claim that humans and apes were linked , substantiation appear in Piltdown , England : A paleontologist bring up Charles Dawson claimed to have found the fossilise skull of a creature with the large brain case of a man and the jaw of a keen ape . The miss connexion was literal . Unfortunately , it was a hoax — but whose hoax , and why ? researcher say they have a reasonably good theme : Dawson himself . They published their report in the journalRoyal Society Open Science .
The first fogey , recover in 1912 , seemed to bring up as many questions as it answer . The skull was clear old , but it looked an awful lot like somebody had just paste fragment of several animals together . Yet Dawson insisted it was the real deal , and found vindication when his subsequent excavation uncover another , similar skull , along with extra teeth , stone instrument , and the fossilized corpse of other mammalian from around the same projected time full point . " Piltdown Man"—a.k.a . Eoanthropus dawsoni , or " Dawson ’s dawn man"—became the toast of British scientific society . In your face , Dawson told his detractors . ( He ’s the smug - look gent in the top row of the painting above . ) And then he died .
Image credit : Mike Peelvia Wikimedia Commons // CC BY - SA 4.0
Less than a half - century afterthat , scientistsconfirmedwhat the sceptic had been aver from the beginning : The remains of Piltdown Man were just a patchwork of primate component . But the details of the put-on stay undecipherable , and to this day scientists are still attempt to pick apart the counterfeiter ’s identity , proficiency , and motivations .
The most late investigation had several aim : to identify incisively how many brute skulls conk into the two Piltdown Man “ fossils , ” to trace the origin of those skull , and to determine if all the counterfeit were made by the same somebody . Researchers assess the fakes and scanned them using radiography and cypher imaging ( CT ) . They took DNA sample and used radiocarbon date stamp to limit the age of all the fragment .
Their final result designate that the skull were made from the remains of one orangutang and at least two medieval humans . All of the bone fragments had been fake the same way : stained brownish with chromic acid and iron , load up with little pieces of crushed rock , and held in place with putty . That ’s not a coincidence , the researchers write ; the same mortal must have been creditworthy for all of it .
For all of his suspicious behaviour , Dawson was far from the only defendant . Since the first skull come along in 1912 , at least 20 other men have been accuse of fraud . suspect included Dawson ’s collaborationist Arthur Smith Woodward , paleontologist and Jesuit priestTeilhard de Chardin , andSir Arthur Conan Doyle(who was himselfbamboozled by childrenjust a few years later ) .
Still , through it all , Dawson stay the most likely culprit , and the researchers believe he still is . “ Not only did Dawson have the access and connections necessary to find the specimens , he was also a great networker , ” the author indite . More significantly , he “ would have known what the British scientific community was foresee in a missing link between apes and mankind : a large brain , an ape - like face and jaw , and heavily fossilized textile that argue great ancientness . ” And Dawson ’s experience as a fossil collector would have made it relatively easy for him to figure out how to make it take care veridical . Then , of form , there ’s the fact that the fossils arrest reverse up after Dawson snuff it in 1916 .
But why ? The writer ’ good guesswork is that Dawson ’s ambition got the best of him . He wanted desperately to be name a Fellow of the Royal Society , but the Society was n’t playing along . In a 1909 letter to Smith Woodward , he complained , “ I have been waiting for the big ‘ find ’ which never seems to follow along … ”
It seems he got tired of waiting .
Yet even forgeries have object lesson to transmit . “ The Piltdown hoax stand as a cautionary story to scientists not to be led by preconceived idea , ” the author write , “ but to use scientific integrity and rigor in the boldness of new discoveries . ”
Know of something you think we should cover ? netmail us attips@mentalfloss.com .
